- Topic
14k Popularity
14k Popularity
139k Popularity
2k Popularity
20k Popularity
- Pin
- 🎉 Hey Gate Square friends! Non-stop perks and endless excitement—our hottest posting reward events are ongoing now! The more you post, the more you win. Don’t miss your exclusive goodies! 🚀
🆘 #Gate 2025 Semi-Year Community Gala# | Square Content Creator TOP 10
Only 1 day left! Your favorite creator is one vote away from TOP 10. Interact on Square to earn Votes—boost them and enter the prize draw. Prizes: iPhone 16 Pro Max, Golden Bull sculpture, Futures Vouchers!
Details 👉 https://www.gate.com/activities/community-vote
1️⃣ #Show My Alpha Points# | Share your Alpha points & gains
Post your - 🚀 ETH jumped to $4,600 this morning, up 8.69% in 24h!
Just shy of the $4,891 ATH—think it breaks through?
📍 Follow Gate_Square, vote and drop your reason.
🎁 4 winners split $100 Futures Voucher! - 📢 Exclusive on Gate Square — #PROVE Creative Contest# is Now Live!
CandyDrop × Succinct (PROVE) — Trade to share 200,000 PROVE 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46469
Futures Lucky Draw Challenge: Guaranteed 1 PROVE Airdrop per User 👉 https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/46491
🎁 Endless creativity · Rewards keep coming — Post to share 300 PROVE!
📅 Event PeriodAugust 12, 2025, 04:00 – August 17, 2025, 16:00 UTC
📌 How to Participate
1.Publish original content on Gate Square related to PROVE or the above activities (minimum 100 words; any format: analysis, tutorial, creativ - 💙 Gate Square #Gate Blue Challenge# 💙
Show your limitless creativity with Gate Blue!
📅 Event Period
August 11 – 20, 2025
🎯 How to Participate
1. Post your original creation (image / video / hand-drawn art / digital work, etc.) on Gate Square, incorporating Gate’s brand blue or the Gate logo.
2. Include the hashtag #Gate Blue Challenge# in your post title or content.
3. Add a short blessing or message for Gate in your content (e.g., “Wishing Gate Exchange continued success — may the blue shine forever!”).
4. Submissions must be original and comply with community guidelines. Plagiarism or re
What Are the Biggest Smart Contract Vulnerabilities in Crypto History?
Major smart contract hacks resulted in over $2 billion losses
The cryptocurrency landscape in 2025 has been marred by devastating security breaches, with smart contract vulnerabilities leading to unprecedented financial losses. The first quarter alone recorded over $2 billion in stolen funds, exceeding the total losses of the previous year. This alarming trend was headlined by the Bybit exchange exploit, which resulted in approximately $1.4 billion in losses—the single largest hack of the year.
Security researchers have identified specific vulnerabilities that contributed to these massive exploits:
| Vulnerability Type | Loss Amount | Notable Examples | |-------------------|-------------|------------------| | Access Control Flaws | $1.63B | Bybit ($1.4B) | | Multisig Failures | $300M+ | Various exchanges | | Smart Contract Bugs | $264M | Cetus overflow bug | | Rug Pulls | $300M+ | Multiple projects |
Security auditors from Hacken reported that by mid-2025, the total losses had escalated to more than $3.1 billion, with access-control vulnerabilities remaining the primary attack vector. State-sponsored actors have also entered this criminal landscape, employing sophisticated techniques to compromise even supposedly secure systems. The DMM Bitcoin hack ($305 million) further demonstrated how private key compromise can devastate centralized exchanges handling substantial user funds, emphasizing the critical need for robust security frameworks across the cryptocurrency ecosystem.
The DAO hack of 2016 exposed critical vulnerabilities in Ethereum
The Ethereum blockchain faced its first major security crisis on June 17, 2016, when an anonymous hacker exploited a vulnerability in The DAO's smart contract code. This catastrophic event resulted in the theft of 3.6 million Ether (approximately $50 million USD at the time) from the project's funds, representing one-third of The DAO's total assets. The vulnerability existed within the smart contract architecture that governed The DAO's operations, revealing fundamental security weaknesses in Ethereum's nascent infrastructure.
| DAO Hack Impact | Details | |----------------|---------| | Funds Stolen | 3.6 million ETH (~$50M) | | Percentage of DAO Funds | Approximately 33% | | Community Response | Controversial hard fork |
The Ethereum community responded with a controversial solution: implementing a hard fork of the entire blockchain to reverse the hack's effects through what was termed an "irregular state change." This unprecedented action effectively rolled back Ethereum's transaction history to before the attack, allowing investors to withdraw their funds from a different smart contract. The incident sparked intense debate about blockchain immutability principles versus investor protection, permanently influencing Ethereum's development philosophy. The Gate exchange and other platforms had to adapt to this significant change in the Ethereum ecosystem, highlighting the complex intersection of decentralized governance and security challenges.
Centralized exchanges remain a significant point of failure
Centralized exchanges have consistently proven to be one of the blockchain industry's most vulnerable components. Despite their prominence in crypto trading, these platforms repeatedly fail to meet basic compliance standards, compromising the entire ecosystem's credibility. In 2023 alone, over 40 centralized exchanges collapsed in the first few months, revealing a troubling pattern of instability.
The vulnerabilities of centralized exchanges manifest in several critical areas:
| Vulnerability | Impact | Real-world Consequences | |---------------|--------|-------------------------| | Regulatory Non-compliance | Legal actions and shutdowns | Federal investigations for sanctions violations | | Market Manipulation | Distorted asset values | Wash trading affecting legitimate traders | | Liquidation Risks | Exchange insolvency | Limited insurance funds cannot cover large-scale events | | Custodial Control | "Not your keys, not your coins" | User assets locked during exchange failures |
The fundamental contradiction lies in centralizing control over decentralized assets, creating concentration risk that undermines blockchain's core promise. When exchanges retain custody over users' assets, they reintroduce the very single points of failure that distributed ledger technology was designed to eliminate. Federal investigations into major exchanges for breaking American sanctions further highlight the regulatory fragility of these institutions, damaging public trust and slowing mainstream adoption of cryptocurrency technologies.