Before exploring the world of cryptocurrencies, engaging with Decentralized Finance protocols, exchange wealth management, stablecoin yield pools, or staking ETH, you will continuously see a key indicator: Annualized Return Rate, which is often abbreviated as APY (Annual Percentage Yield) or APR (Annual Percentage Rate).
At first glance, this number seems to be just an interest rate, but in the blockchain world, it serves as a compass for assessing yield opportunities and risk-reward ratios. A 5% APY stablecoin pool may represent very low risk, while an 80% APY liquidity mining pool may be hiding significant volatility, IL (Impermanent Loss), or even a Rug Pull.
Because cryptocurrency investments are not as singular as traditional fixed deposits or ETFs, the yield opportunities in Web3 are diverse, including:
For example, when providing liquidity to pools on platforms like Uniswap and PancakeSwap, the platform will distribute trading fees and platform token rewards based on the user's share of funds. These rewards will be converted into APY for presentation. However, it is important to note that:
Mainstream exchanges like Gate will offer fixed-term/current deposit products:
The advantages of this type of product are user-friendly interfaces and relatively controllable risks, but the returns are usually lower than those of native DeFi projects.
In the POS blockchain ecosystem represented by ETH, Staking is the way for validators to earn block rewards and transaction fees. The platform will inform users with the annualized return rate:
Actual returns will be adjusted according to block output and inflation rate, and the annualized return rates provided by the platform are mostly estimates.
Many DAO projects will adopt a locked staking annual incentive model, such as Curve, Balancer, veToken model, designed to:
However, this type of return rate is often affected by token prices and community participation levels, and is not guaranteed.
Horizontal comparison: Do not look at just one platform; compare the same product across different platforms to choose the one with the most reasonable balance of returns and risks.
Combine stablecoin assets for allocation: high annualized returns are not necessarily good and are suitable to be paired with stablecoin products like USDT and DAI to smooth out volatility.
Platform trustworthiness and security assessment: A platform with an annualized return of 100% may not necessarily be better than an old platform with an annualized return of 10%; safety and sustainability are the key.
Using in conjunction with yield aggregators: such as Yearn, Beefy, AutoFarm, etc., to help you dynamically mine the best annualized return strategies.
In the Web3 world, behind every seemingly high annualized return, there is a risk model and market mechanism. Learning to break down the sources of returns and assess risks is essential to truly understand whether an investment product is worth participating in.
Before exploring the world of cryptocurrencies, engaging with Decentralized Finance protocols, exchange wealth management, stablecoin yield pools, or staking ETH, you will continuously see a key indicator: Annualized Return Rate, which is often abbreviated as APY (Annual Percentage Yield) or APR (Annual Percentage Rate).
At first glance, this number seems to be just an interest rate, but in the blockchain world, it serves as a compass for assessing yield opportunities and risk-reward ratios. A 5% APY stablecoin pool may represent very low risk, while an 80% APY liquidity mining pool may be hiding significant volatility, IL (Impermanent Loss), or even a Rug Pull.
Because cryptocurrency investments are not as singular as traditional fixed deposits or ETFs, the yield opportunities in Web3 are diverse, including:
For example, when providing liquidity to pools on platforms like Uniswap and PancakeSwap, the platform will distribute trading fees and platform token rewards based on the user's share of funds. These rewards will be converted into APY for presentation. However, it is important to note that:
Mainstream exchanges like Gate will offer fixed-term/current deposit products:
The advantages of this type of product are user-friendly interfaces and relatively controllable risks, but the returns are usually lower than those of native DeFi projects.
In the POS blockchain ecosystem represented by ETH, Staking is the way for validators to earn block rewards and transaction fees. The platform will inform users with the annualized return rate:
Actual returns will be adjusted according to block output and inflation rate, and the annualized return rates provided by the platform are mostly estimates.
Many DAO projects will adopt a locked staking annual incentive model, such as Curve, Balancer, veToken model, designed to:
However, this type of return rate is often affected by token prices and community participation levels, and is not guaranteed.
Horizontal comparison: Do not look at just one platform; compare the same product across different platforms to choose the one with the most reasonable balance of returns and risks.
Combine stablecoin assets for allocation: high annualized returns are not necessarily good and are suitable to be paired with stablecoin products like USDT and DAI to smooth out volatility.
Platform trustworthiness and security assessment: A platform with an annualized return of 100% may not necessarily be better than an old platform with an annualized return of 10%; safety and sustainability are the key.
Using in conjunction with yield aggregators: such as Yearn, Beefy, AutoFarm, etc., to help you dynamically mine the best annualized return strategies.
In the Web3 world, behind every seemingly high annualized return, there is a risk model and market mechanism. Learning to break down the sources of returns and assess risks is essential to truly understand whether an investment product is worth participating in.